
Written in collaboration with Jean Guo
There is finally a glimmer of hope in the fight against obesity, a critical public health and economic crisis burdening our nation. After several decades of steep upswings, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently reported that obesity rates in the U.S. may be stabilizing, with no significant change in prevalence over the past two years for children [1]. However, experts also warn of the major challenges ahead in the battle against obesity in America.
Despite the apparent recent leveling-off in childhood obesity rates, the prevalence of obesity nonetheless remains high, with more than one-third of adults and almost 17 percent of youth obese in 2009-2010. There are also significant concerns about the health and economic consequences that result from obesity-related complications. Diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, and osteoarthritis are just some of the illnesses associated with obesity that impose human suffering as well as significant medical costs [2]. In 2008, obesity-related medical expenses reached $147 billion, double the amount spent 10 years ago. This figure is projected to rise to $344 billion by 2018, underscoring the magnitude of the economic threat, as an estimated 50 million days of employment and $150 billion in productivity are lost annually in the U.S. due to overweight and obesity-related chronic conditions [3].
To address this health crisis, attention must be focused on a key issue that lies at the core of the epidemic: the social inequities of obesity. A significant body of scientific evidence links poverty with higher rates of obesity. Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the most comprehensive study conducted thus far to document the nutritional status of the U.S. population, has found that low-income children and adolescents are more likely to be obese than their higher income counterparts [4]. Additionally, reports have shown a higher prevalence of obesity among low-income adults. One study revealed that more than one-third of adults who earn less than $15,000 annually were obese, as compared to 25 percent of those who earn more than $50,000 a year [5]. Visually, a compelling correlation emerges when comparing maps detailing poverty and obesity rates in the U.S. (See images below)
U.S. POVERTY RATES BY STATE (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)
U.S. OBESITY RATES BY STATE (Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
Major contributing factors to the disproportional impact of obesity on low income populations in America include the barriers faced by people living in poverty in accessing healthy foods, a lack of nutrition education, a dearth of safe environments for physical activity and recreation, and food marketing targeted to this population. Population level data have shown that diet quality follows a socioeconomic gradient. People with higher socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to consume whole grains, lean meats, fish, low-fat dairy products, and fresh vegetables and fruit. In contrast, lower SES is associated with the consumption of more refined grains and added fats [6].
Simply stated, families with limited economic resources may turn to food with poor nutritional quality because it is cheaper and more accessible [7]. Lack of physical activity is another commonly-cited problem fueling the obesity epidemic in America. Some low-income families live in neighborhoods where it is dangerous to play outside, reducing opportunities for both children and adults to exercise [8]. Furthermore, many low-income communities lack access to fresh and nutritious food. Instead of a supermarket, these neighborhoods may have an abundance of fast-food retailers and corner stores that are stocked with products high in fat and low in nutrients [9]. Additionally, low-income families are often targeted by food marketers with advertisements encouraging the consumption of nutrient-poor foods. In this environment, children in low-income families are especially hard hit, as evidence demonstrates that consistent exposure to such advertising increases the likelihood of adopting unhealthy dietary practices [10].
Therefore, in developing a strategy to reverse the obesity epidemic in America, a comprehensive “health in all policies” approach must be implemented. A roadmap to reverse obesity will not only tackle health and nutrition issues, but also focus on the underlying social and environmental factors that contribute to this public health problem. Decades of scientific research have revealed that our health habits and environments — the choices people make regarding tobacco use, alcohol, food, and exercise, and the communities in which they live with their transportation systems, workplaces, grocery stores, and schools — all impact health. Thus, a broad range of strategies are needed to address the individual, social and environmental factors and their interactions that affect people’s health-related behaviors.
At the national level, several initiatives have been launched to address these fundamental issues. The Affordable Care Act 2010 has mandated inclusion of menu labeling in restaurants and on vending machines, the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act 2010 has set nutrition standards for foods served in schools and child care facilities, and the increase in the number of Baby Friendly hospitals has expanded efforts to promote breastfeeding [11]. Furthermore, First Lady Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move Campaign is mobilizing all sectors of society to get involved in reversing childhood obesity rates within a generation. As part of this initiative, the Child Care State Challenge is encouraging the adoption of voluntary standards for physical activity, limits on screen time, healthy beverages, and promoting the availability of healthy foods in child care settings.
At the community level, new affordable housing neighborhoods like Greenbridge, Washington (located in King County near Seattle) are being designed and built as models for creating an environment that promotes healthy diets and active lifestyles for their residents. In this predominantly immigrant community where more than 15 languages are spoken, more than 54 percent of adults are overweight or obese, and more than 85 percent of adolescents in grades 8, 10, and 12 do not meet the physical activity recommendations set by the federal government [12]. Supported by Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities (HKHC), a national program funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that promotes community-based solutions, Greenbridge focuses on shaping the environment to encourage healthy behaviors among families, with special attention to children who are at the highest risk. Thus far, a comprehensive set of measures has been put in place to foster the development of a healthier community. In addition to an elementary school, a Head Start program, and a Boy and Girls Club, this new affordable housing initiative offers community gardens to grow fresh fruits and vegetables, a library, as well as play areas, parks, and walking paths. A food bank, a public health clinic, and a community center that provides free exercise classes are located just a few blocks away.
This integrative approach has turned a troubled neighborhood into a welcoming place to live. This new community emphasizes the importance of cultivating a nurturing environment for youth, especially as children and adolescents constitute over a quarter of the neighborhood’s population.
Initiatives like this one that involve not only individuals but the entire family and community provide a model for how to improve the health of cities across our nation. Targeting only one aspect of the problem will not be effective in fighting the obesity epidemic, since many of its causes stem from broad social and environmental factors. Moreover, to effectively confront the disproportionate impact of obesity on low income populations, the social determinants of health — including the significant disparities that poorer people experience — must be addressed.
Communities are the cornerstone for preventive interventions that increase the accessibility of fresh foods and physical activity, implement policies to reduce the marketing of unhealthy foods to children and adults, and help make healthy nutritional choices easier and affordable. In this regard, public-private partnerships are critical in bringing families, businesses, health care organizations, government and other stakeholders together to reverse the impact of obesity in our country.
Margaret Mead once said, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” To contribute your perspectives and ideas on ways to tip the scales on obesity and make the changes needed for healthier communities and a healthier country, visit www.SNAPtoHealth.org, an online forum on the state of nutrition in the United States. While the path to reversing the obesity epidemic in America is challenging, by working together, we can ensure a healthier future for all Americans.
Rear Admiral Susan Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.A. (ret.) is the Public Health Editor of the Huffington Post. She is the Director of the Health and Medicine Program at the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress in Washington, D.C., a Clinical Professor at Georgetown and Tufts University Schools of Medicine, Chair of the Global Health Program at the Meridian International Center, and Senior Policy and Medical Advisor at amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research. Dr. Blumenthal served for more than 20 years in senior health leadership positions in the Federal government in the Administrations of four U.S. Presidents, including as Assistant Surgeon General of the United States, the first Deputy Assistant Secretary of Women’s Health, as a White House Advisor on Health, and as Chief of the Behavioral Medicine and Basic Prevention Research Branch at the National Institutes of Health. Admiral Blumenthal has received numerous awards including honorary doctorates and has been decorated with the highest medals of the US Public Health Service for her pioneering leadership and significant contributions to advancing health in the United States and worldwide. She is the recipient of the 2009 Health Leader of the Year Award from the Commissioned Officers Association and was named as a Rock Star of Science by the Geoffrey Beene Foundation and GQ magazine.
Jean Guo is an undergraduate student at Stanford University who is currently studying in Paris. She served as a Health Policy Intern at the Center for the Presidency and Congress in Washington, D.C.
References
[1] U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics. Prevalence of Obesity in the United States, 2009-2010. Jan 2012, available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db82.htm.
[2] Wang, Y. Claire, Klim McPherson, Tim Marsh, Steven L. Gortmaker, and Martin Brown. “Health and Economic Burden of the Projected Obesity Trends in the USA and the UK.” The Lancet 378.9793 (2011): 815-25.
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)60814-3/fulltext
[3] Michina, Laura. “Congress Must Tackle Obesity and Costs to Economy.” The Hill’s Congress Blog. January16, 2012, available at http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/204335-congress-must-tackle-obesity-and-costs-to-economy.
[4] U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics. Obesity and Socioeconomic Status in Children and Adolescents: United States, 2005-2008. Dec 2010, available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db51.pdf.
[5] Izzo, Phil. “The Connection between Obesity and Poverty.” WSJ.com. July 7, 2011, available at http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2011/07/07/the-connection-between-obesity-and-poverty/.
[6] Darmon, N., and A. Drewnowski. “Does Social Class Predict Diet Quality?” Am J Clin Nutr 87.5 (May 2008): 1107-17.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18469226
[7] Drewnowski, Adam, Nicole Darmon, and André Briend. “Replacing Fats and Sweets With Vegetables and Fruits–A Question of Cost.” American Journal of Public Health 94.9 (September 2004): 1555-1559. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1555
[8] Siple, Julie. “Researchers Untangling Link between Hunger and Obesity.” MPR News. January 27, 2012, available at http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/01/27/hunger-obesity/.
[9] Larson, Nicole I., Mary T. Story, and Melissa C. Nelson. “Neighborhood Environments: Disparities in Access to Healthy Foods in the U.S.” Am J Prev Med 36.1 (2009): 74-81.
http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(08)00838-6/abstract
[10] Grier, S. A., and S. K. Kumanyika. “The Context for Choice: Health Implications of Targeted Food and Beverage Marketing to African Americans.” American Journal of Public Health 98.9 (2008): 1616-629. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18633097
[11] Dietz, William H. “Reversing the tide of obesity.” The Lancet 378 (August 2011): 744-5. http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)61218-X/fulltext.
[12] “Winning Strategies in the Fight Against Childhood Obesity.” Seattle-Area Affordable Housing Community Planting Gardens, Building Sidewalks. November 23, 2011, available at http://www.rwjf.org/childhoodobesity/product.jsp?id=73623.
For more articles by Susan Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.A., click here.
For more healthy living health news, click here.
Just as I was about to extol the many virtues of Peter Kaminsky’s new book, brilliantly titled Culinary Intelligence: The Art of Eating Healthy (and Really Well), I happened upon a dose of Culinary Insanity in the food pages of today’s New York Times. In an article about an exemplary initiative to teach doctors about nutrition, a recipe appears that is so unhealthy as to render the project questionable.
Who’s in charge here? Who makes the decisions about what is healthy? And why would anyone choose a drink that contains more sugar than a Coke to illustrate the idea behind healthful food consumption? Not only does the simple recipe for limeade contain 24 grams of refined white sugar per serving (that’s 90 calories worth of sugar alone), but it is made with peanuts, which may trigger a bout of allergies for some. Really, what were they thinking? It reminds me a bit of the book Why French Women Don’t Get Fat, where the premise is certainly laudable — eat small portions of delicious things — but, alas, there was not a nutritional analysis in sight and many of the recipes that looked healthy were not, even in petit portions.
That said, as I have written several books on healthy eating, Healthy 1-2-3, Low Carb 1-2-3 (the only book with recipes that are low carb and low cal), and Eat Fresh Food: Awesome Recipes for Teen Chefs, I know the many vicissitudes in creating recipes that are healthy and delicious. It comes with decades of experience working with nutritionists, clinical herbalists, and creating one of the country’s first “spa cuisines” at the Rainbow Room many years ago. The program extolled in the New York Times today — a joint effort of the Harvard School of Public Health, the Culinary Institute of America, and Healthy Kitchens/Healthy Lives created by Dr. Eisenberg eight years ago, to teach young medical professionals about healthy cooking, is certainly worthwhile. It is a good idea for doctors to know something about the relationship between food and nutrition. Yet it is incumbent upon anyone who invokes the BRAND of healthy cooking to define its terms and make sure the public gets the right information.
That said, there’s a wonderful juncture of ideologies in Peter Kaminsky’s Culinary Intelligence (published next month by Alfred A. Knopf) and Dr. Eisenberg’s approach to healthy food. It’s all about flavor. Dr. Eisenberg says “flavor is a health issue,” and Mr. Kaminsky unfurls a culinary marker called FPC, or flavor per calorie. If we satisfy our cravings with fresh foods that maximize flavor, then we might be sated with less and enjoy our food more. Many studies have shown that processed foods, full of unpronounceable additives, do not satisfy us either gastronomically or spiritually, and actually create the desire for more, and more, of the unhealthy stuff. Mr. Kaminsky, a well-known food writer and critic, was rejected from a life insurance policy because he was pre-diabetic. And that is what led him to write his treatise. It is not a diet book, but a book about pursuing the pleasures of the table as the path to good health. I think Dr. Eisenberg would agree. But they depart here: Mr. Kaminsky says the three most important foods or ingredients to avoid are sugar, refined (white) flour, and trans fats, while Dr. Eisenberg eschews butter (note: butter can be used with culinary intelligence as it is a terrific flavor carrier and a little goes a long way), and seems to be okay with sugary drinks (i.e. today’s recipe for Peanut Limeade.) Culinary Intelligence also pursues the deep complex flavors imparted by umami (a flavor-enhancing glutamate that exists in many foods — known as the “fifth taste”), and the soul-satisfying approach to healthy food by the simple notion of mindfulness and pleasure and, of course, using great ingredients.
Needless to say, good health is also about good exercise. I just learned this morning that after 28 days in “boot camp” my son lost 10 pounds, 1 percent of body fat, and 3 inches off his waistline!
The bottom line is that not only should doctors know about healthy recipes, and nutritionists should know how to cook, but most importantly the chefs who promote healthy food must know something about nutrition.
Rozanne Gold is an award-winning chef and author of “Eat Fresh Food: Awesome Recipes for Teen Chefs;” “Healthy 1-2-3,” and “Radically Simple.”
Rozanne can be found on Facebook at www.facebook.com/RozanneGold.

Alveo